Khan Asudullah Khan, Ashwin Raut, C. Rama Chandrudu, C. Sashidhar


The focus of the researchers has now shifted towards the geopolymer based materials as it considered as sustainable alternative to the existing cementitious materials. This paper attempts to incorporate the binary blend of pozzolanic material to develop geopolymer composite and understand it’s mechanical and water transport performance as a building material. The combination of bottom ash and rice husk ash with fly ash as a common binder was used for development of geopolymer composite. Replacement levels of both bottom ash and rice husk ash was kept at 40%, 30% and 20% of total solid proportions. Also, the molarity of NaOH was provided at 12 M and 14 M levels respectively. The results showed that the blend of FA-BA blend to be better performed against the blend of FA-RHA blend for their mechanical and water transport properties. The compressive strength of the geopolymer composite having blend of fly ash and bottom ash reached to the value of 41.49 MPa due to its suitable Si/Al ratio for geopolymerization reaction, which is quite remarkable. Also, the results of water transport performance shows the blend of FA-BA to be 15-20% more resistant to percolation of water as compared to FA-RHA blended geopolymer composite, thus lowering the risk of damages to the structures.


Geopolymer, Pozzolanic Materials, Bottom ash, Rice Husk Ash, Sustainable

Full Text:



Cembureau. 2013. World Statistical Review 2001–2011. Cement Production, Trade, Consumption Data.

Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. 2016. Eco-efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-based Materials Industry.

Footprint, F. W., & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2013. Toolkit: Reducing the Food Wastage Footprint. Food Agriculture Organization (FAO).

BEF-India Brand Equity Foundation. 2017. Cement, www. Accessed 10 Aug 2018.

Gettu, R., Patel, A., Rathi, V., Prakasan, S., Basavaraj, A. S., Palaniappan, S., & Maity, S. 2019. Influence of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Sustainability Parameters of Cements and Concretes in the Indian Context. Materials and Structures. 52(1): 10.

Turner, L. K., & Collins, F. G. 2013. Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2-e) Emissions: A Comparison between Geopolymer and OPC Cement Concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 43: 125-130.

Davidovits, J. 2008. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. Geopolymer Institute.

Ahmari, S., & Zhang, L. 2013. Utilization of Cement Kiln Dust (CKD) to Enhance Mine Tailings-based Geopolymer Bricks. Construction and Building Materials. 40: 1002-1011.

Khale, D., & Chaudhary, R. 2007. Mechanism of Geopolymerization and Factors Influencing Its Development: A Review. Journal of Materials Science. 42(3): 729-746.

Soutsos, M., Boyle, A. P., Vinai, R., Hadjierakleous, A., & Barnett, S. J. 2016. Factors Influencing the Compressive Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials. 110: 355-368.

Part, W. K., Ramli, M., & Cheah, C. B. 2015. An Overview on the Influence of Various Factors on the Properties of Geopolymer Concrete Derived from Industrial By-Products. Construction and Building Materials. 77: 370-395.

Huiskes, D. M. A., Keulen, A., Yu, Q. L., & Brouwers, H. J. H. 2016. Design and Performance Evaluation of Ultra-Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete. Materials & Design. 89: 516-526.

Pasupathy, K., Berndt, M., Sanjayan, J., Rajeev, P., & Cheema, D. S. 2018. Durability Performance of Precast Fly Ash–Based Geopolymer Concrete under Atmospheric Exposure Conditions. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 30(3): 04018007.

Aliabdo, A. A., Elmoaty, A. E. M. A., & Salem, H. A. 2016. Effect of Water Addition, Plasticizer and Alkaline Solution Constitution on Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete Performance. Construction and Building Materials. 121: 694-703.

Abdollahnejad, Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, H., & Mastali, M. 2018. Comparative Study on the Drying Shrinkage and Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Foam Concrete Incorporating Different Dosages of Fiber, Sand and Foam Agents. High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet. Springer, Cham. 42-48.

Chithambaram, S. J., Kumar, S., Prasad, M. M., & Adak, D. 2018. Effect of Parameters on the Compressive Strength of Fly Ash based Geopolymer Concrete. Structural Concrete. 19(4): 1202-1209.

Chindaprasirt, P., & Rattanasak, U. 2017. Characterization of the High-calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar with Hot-Weather Curing Systems for Sustainable Application. Advanced Powder Technology. 28(9): 2317-2324.

Huseien, G. F., Mirza, J., Ismail, M., & Hussin, M. W. 2016. Influence of Different Curing Temperatures and Alkali Activators on Properties of GBFS Geopolymer Mortars Containing Fly Ash and Palm-oil Fuel Ash. Construction and Building Materials. 125: 1229-1240.

Standard, Indian. 2004. Method of Test of Pozolanic Materials. Indian Standard 1727. 1-49.

ASTM C109/C109M-16a. 2016. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA,

Standard, A. S. T. M. 1999. C373-88. Standard Test Method for Water Absorption, Bulk Density, Apparent Density and the Apparent Specific Gravity of Fired Whiteware Products. American Society for Testing Materials.

ASTM, C. 2000. 348, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. Annual Book of ASTM standards. 4: 221-226.

ASTM, C. 2004. 1585-04. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes. ASTM International.

Barbosa, T. R., Foletto, E. L., Dotto, G. L., & Jahn, S. L. 2018. Preparation of Mesoporous Geopolymer using Metakaolin and Rice Husk Ash as Synthesis Precursors and Its Use as Potential Adsorbent to Remove Organic Dye From Aqueous Solutions. Ceramics International. 44(1): 416-423.

Singh, B., Ishwarya, G., Gupta, M., & Bhattacharyya, S. K. 2015. Geopolymer Concrete: A Review of Some Recent Developments. Construction and Building Materials. 85: 78-90.



  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.