Anis Nismayanti, Marlin R. Baidillah, Mahfudz Al Huda, Bambang Prihandoko, Triwikantoro Triwikantoro, Endarko Endarko, Warsito P. Taruno


Wire mesh sensor has been successfully fabricated and used for measurement of the electric field in emulated human body tissue. Measurement of electric field in human body tissue needs to be done, because the electric field is very useful for the treatment especially cancer treatment and also important for health. In this study, we propose a novel electric field measurement method by using wire mesh sensor (wms), that is all channels on the wire act as receivers, and each cross point of the wire are interconnected. While in existing wire mesh sensors, there are two perpendicular channels of transmitter and receiver, and each channel is unrelated, there is a distance between the two channels. At present, wire mesh sensors 3 × 3 and 8 × 8 were used to measure the value of electric field at each wire intersection point. The wire mesh sensor consists of copper wire in a cylindrical body model with diameter 14 [cm]. The emulated human body tissue were inserted in the wire mesh sensor. Furthermore, linear back propagation technique and bilinear interpolation used for image reconstruction of the electric field distribution. The result showed that the wire mesh sensor 8 × 8 has better resolution than wire mesh sensor 3 × 3. The characterisation of wire mesh sensor 8 × 8  for measurement of electric field in emulated human body tissue is obtained lower than measurement in the air with a ratio of 82%. Meanwhile, the wire mesh sensor 3 × 3 could be achieved at 61.8%. This study can be a new science in measuring electric field so that electric field-based treatment planning system can be more optimal.


Electric field, emulated human body tissue, wire mesh sensor, image reconstruction, bilinear interpolation

Full Text:



E. D. Kirson, Z. Gurvich, R. Schneiderman, E. Dekel, A. Itzhaki, Y. Wasserman, R. Schatzberger, and Y. Palti. 2004. Disruption of Cancer Cell Replication by Alternating Electric Fields. Cancer Res. 64(9): 3288-95.

E. D. Kirson, V. Dbalý, F. Tovaryš, J. Vymazal, J. F. Soustiel, A. Itzhaki, D. Mordechovich, S. Steinberg-Shapira, Z. Gurvich, R. Schneiderman, Y. Wasserman, M. Salzberg, B. Ryffel, D. Goldsher, E. Dekel, and Y. Palti. 2007. Alternating Electric fields Arrest Cell Proliferation in Animal Tumor Models and Human Brain Tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104(24): 10152-10157.

R. Nuccitelli, U. Pliquett, X. Chen, W. Ford, R. James Swanson, S. J. Beebe, J. F. Kolb, and K. H. Schoenbach. 2006. Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields Cause Melanomas to Self-destruct. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 343(2): 351-360.

L. Carr, S. M. Bardet, R. C. Burke, D. Arnaud-Cormos, P. Leveque, and R. P. O’Connor. 2017. Calcium-independent Disruption of Microtubule Dynamics by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields in U87 Human Glioblastoma Cells. Sci. Rep. 7: (7252): 1-12.

S. A. Mujib, F. Alamsyah, and W. P. Taruno. 2017. Cell Death and Induced p53 Expression in Oral Cancer, HeLa, and Bone Marrow Mesenchyme Cells under the Exposure to Noncontact Electric Fields. Integr. Med. Int. 4(3-4): 161-170.

W. P. Taruno. 2017. Kapasitif Elektro Terapi (Alat Terapi Penyakit Kanker). 2013/03941.

F. Alamsyah, I. N. Ajrina, F. N. A. Dewi, D. Iskandriati, S. A. Prabandari, and W. P. Taruno. 2017. Antiproliferative Effect of Electric Fields on Breast Tumor Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. Indones. J. Cancer Chemoprevention. 6(3): 71.

M. Giladi, U. Weinberg, R. S. Schneiderman, Y. Porat, M. Munster, T. Voloshin, R. Blatt, S. Cahal, A. Itzhaki, A. Onn, E. D. Kirson, and Y. Palti. 2014. Alternating Electric Fields (Tumor-Treating Fields Therapy) Can Improve Chemotherapy Treatment Efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Both In Vitro and In Vivo. Semin. Oncol. 41: S35-S41.

F. Topfer and J. Oberhammer. 2015. Millimeter-wave Tissue Diagnosis: The Most Promising Fields for Medical Applications. IEEE Microw. Mag. 16(4): 97-113.

H. Prasser, D. Scholz, and C. Zippe. 2001. Bubble Size Measurement Using Wire-mesh Sensors. Flow Meas. Instrum. elsevier. 12: 299-312.

M. J. Da Silva, E. Schleicher, and U. Hampel. 2007. Capacitance Wire-mesh Sensor for Fast Measurement of Phase Fraction Distributions. Meas. Sci. Technol. 18(7): 2245-2251.

B. J. Azzopardi, L. a. Abdulkareem, D. Zhao, S. Thiele, M. J. da Silva, M. Beyer, and a. Hunt. 2010. Comparison between Electrical Capacitance Tomography and Wire Mesh Sensor Output for Air/Silicone Oil Flow in a Vertical Pipe. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49(18): 8805-8811.

H. F. Velasco Peña and O. M. H. Rodrigue. 2015. Applications of Wire-mesh Sensors in Multiphase Flows. Flow Meas. Instrum. 45: 255-273.

D. W. Harder. 2012. Laplace’s Equation in 2 and 3 Dimensions. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

D. H. Staelin. 2011. Electromagnetics and Applications. Dep. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. Massachusetts Inst. Technol. Cambridge, MA. 1-442.

W. Warsito, Q. Marashdeh, and L. S. Fan. 2007. Electrical Capacitance Volume Tomography. IEEE Sens. J. 7(4): 525-535.

P. Chen, Y. Ji, and N. Jin. 2012. Study on Image Reconstruction Algorithms for Wire Mesh Tomography System. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 133-138.

D. Miklavčič, N. Pavšelj, and F. X. Hart. 2006. Electric Properties of Tissues. Wiley Encycl. Biomed. Eng. 1-12.

L. Andiani, Endarko, M. Al Huda, and W. P. Taruno. 2017. A Novel Method for Analyzing Electric Field Distribution of Electro Capacitive Cancer Treatment (ECCT) Using Wire Mesh Electrodes: A Case Study of Brain Cancer Therapy. EuroMediterranean Biomed. J. 12(38): 178-183.

M. Handriyanto. 2006. Electro-Capacitive Cancer Treatment (ECCT) Effectiveness for Brain Cancer. Univ. Indones.

LEA and BURKE. 2013. Electric Fields in Dielectrics. Phys. 360 - Electr. Magn. 1: 1-10.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.12941


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.